Close ✕ Services For Publishers About Articles YouTube Get In Touch

Sample scorecard & catalog results

See the format before you share a single export

This page shows what catalog performance intelligence looks like in practice: a decision-ready scorecard, plus the portfolio instrumentation behind it — royalties vs ad spend, true cost per new reader, and audience and creative efficiency.

Illustrative / anonymized. Figures below come from multi-title fiction operations tooling (KdpDeck). They are not a promise of identical results on your list. Named press and agency case studies will replace pattern examples as paid Diagnostics complete.

What you get in the sample PDF

  • One-page executive snapshot (portfolio health flags)
  • One series read-through waterfall with a clear diagnose-or-scale signal
  • Backlist triage labels: Push / Fix / Harvest / Pause
  • Three example moves written so an ops lead can assign owners
  • Watermarked sample — the full Diagnostic covers your ASINs and exports

No email wall required for the PDF if you prefer frictionless trust. (Optional email capture can be added later.)

The decision layer clients keep. Two-page sample catalog health scorecard: triage labels and five recommended moves — not a raw export dump.

The decision layer (what buyers keep)

Software can chart sales. Operators need a monthly answer to:

  1. Which series is healthy enough to fund?
  2. Which titles are ad sinks because the product/series handoff is broken?
  3. Which backlist earns a promo slot vs quiet harvest?
  4. What is the true cost to put a new reader into the funnel?
  5. What are the only five moves for the next 30 to 90 days?

That is the scorecard. Everything below is evidence that the analysis is grounded in real portfolio mechanics — not motivational advice.

1. Portfolio P&L — royalties beside ad spend

Amazon KDP reports royalties and units. Ad platforms report spend and clicks. Most teams never see net contribution on one timeline.

Catalog sales dashboard overlaying daily royalties and advertising spend with net earnings
Portfolio P&L: royalties, ad spend, net. The view KDP's native reports never place side by side.

What to notice in a view like this

  • Royalties earned vs ad spend vs net — the only scoreboard that matters for paid acquisition weeks
  • Daily overlay — whether spend spikes actually move royalty days
  • Strongest-day patterns — a scheduling signal for promos and boost windows
  • Units, KENP, royalties, spend, net by day — an audit trail for the workshop

B2B use: imprint marketing meetings stop arguing from screenshots of two different products.

2. True cost per new reader (catalog acquisition)

CTR is not a business model. Reader acquisition cost is.

Reader acquisition dashboard showing true cost per new reader and conversion by ad
Reader acquisition efficiency. Catalog-level cost per new reader — not vanity CTR.

What to notice

  • True cost per new reader as the primary KPI — live SFF accounts I have worked often land roughly in a $2 to $7 band when setup is sound; see the cost guide
  • Invested → readers acquired → click-to-reader conversion
  • Per-title / per-ad efficiency cards — which creative lines buy readers, which only buy clicks
  • Change detection — new ads appearing in the portfolio without a manual treasure hunt

B2B use: compare acquisition cost to series LTV implied by read-through before scaling budgets. If Book 1 → Book 2 is broken, cheaper clicks still light money on fire (read-through benchmarks discussion).

3. Who converts — audience truth vs targeting folklore

Broad "fantasy readers" targeting is how catalogs waste Q4 budget.

Audience insights comparing age and gender mix of best versus worst performing book ads
Who actually converts. So promo dollars stop chasing the wrong demographic.

What to notice

  • Demographic mix of clicks on winning ads vs losing ads
  • Lean scores (example pattern: older female readers dominating efficient lines in a given list slice)
  • Side-by-side efficient vs inefficient demographic breakdowns

B2B use: rewrite audience assumptions for the imprint; brief freelancers and agencies with evidence; stop funding creatives that attract non-buyers.

4. Creative attributes that buy readers

Covers and ad images are product decisions, not decoration.

Image insights ranking ad creatives by cost per reader and creative attributes
Creative attributes that buy readers. Cover and ad-art implications, ranked by efficiency.

What to notice

  • Cost per new reader by attribute (e.g. face in image, testimonial treatment, art style, setting)
  • Gallery ranked by efficiency, with spend and readers acquired
  • Converting vs not-yet-converting creative sets

B2B use: commission art and ad variations from data; kill pretty losers early; align cover direction with what the converting audience actually responds to.

5. Headline systems at catalog scale

Hooks are a portfolio asset when you run many titles.

Headline insights chart showing click-through rates for top and bottom performing ad headlines
Hook language that sells. Kill losing headlines at catalog scale.

What to notice

  • Winning vs losing headline CTR (illustrative gap: several points of CTR between best and worst lines)
  • Distribution of headlines across best-selling vs worst-selling ads
  • Volume behind each line (clicks and impressions) so you do not overfit a fluke

B2B use: standardize comparable-based hooks that work in your genres; build a swipe file per imprint; stop rotating untested cleverness across the whole list.

How this ties to series read-through

Instrumentation without series economics still misleads. A title can show acceptable ROAS in-platform while the series handoff is below a healthy band — especially when Book 1 is discounted or free.

In the full Diagnostic we calculate sell-through / read-through on your exports (paid and Kindle Unlimited where possible) and label the implication:

Series read-through waterfall showing reader flow from book one through the series, with value per new reader versus cost to acquire and the gap to break-even
Series read-through in one view. How many readers carry from each book to the next, and whether value-per-new-reader clears the cost to acquire — the number that decides whether ad spend is profitable. Illustrative; series title and covers anonymized.
Pattern → typical implication
PatternTypical implication
Strong B1→B2, high CPNRTraffic / creative problem — test hooks and audiences
Weak B1→B2, any CPNRProduct / series problem — do not scale ads first
Strong frontlist, dead midlistPromo and metadata triage opportunity
Spend without royalty responseAttribution and funnel break — fix before more budget

Methodology references practitioners actually use: Kindlepreneur series read-through, Authors Game catalog read-through.

For agencies: white-label performance, not another content kit

If you already produce blurbs, comps, and social kits (including via platforms like ManuscriptReport's publisher services), keep them. Those are pre-launch / content assets.

What client calls still lack is a short post-launch performance narrative:

  • Which client titles deserve ad dollars this month
  • Which need a series / product fix instead
  • Plain-language talking points your account lead can run in five minutes

Sample brief concepts follow the same evidence stack as above, with your logo on the cover. Pack pricing starts in the low hundreds per title or portfolio pack after you have seen format fit — details on the Publishers ladder or by email.

Before

Three tabs and a guess. Royalties here, ad spend there, a screenshot deck for the client call.

After

Five moves with owners. One page your account lead can run in five minutes.

Data handling (short version)

Next steps

  1. Download the sample scorecard PDF
  2. If the format matches how your team decides, request a Diagnostic SOW
  3. Prefer a human overview first? Email [email protected] with your organization type and approximate title count

Publishers overview · Diagnostic details · About JD Caron

Want the scorecard
on your catalog?

Tell me about your operation: press, agency, or multi-pen studio, roughly how many active titles or series, and the tools you already use. I'll send a one-page Diagnostic SOW — scope, price, data checklist, timeline — not a pitch deck.

Typical reply within one business day.

Or email directly

[email protected]